The Rise of Hanna-Barbera and Saturday Morning Cartoons
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4eb1/d4eb160558fabf8f68f5c4f4a9e7f716eb77b492" alt=""
Not everything about this era was a downside, as much as I made it seem in the last page of this essay. While the were ousted from MGM at the end of the 1950's, William Hanna and Joseph Barbera were able to create their own cartoon company, Hanna-Barbera. But with the decline of interest in cartoons in Hollywood and on cinemas (aside from Disney's feature length films), they needed a new medium to appeal to audiences. Then it hit them. What was being deemed the downfall of the motion picture industry as they spoke? Television. While mavericks like Walt Disney took advantage of television to garner greater profits, most of the filmmakers and animators snubbed television. But no one could deny how wonderful it was and how accessible it was in comparison to often hard to get to cinemas.
While it would take many years for cartoons to catch onto the mainstream, there was always a safe and hallowed place for cartoons to blossom and garner eager children: Saturday Mornings. While airing children's programming on Saturday mornings was no new idea (as it had been going on since the early days of television), it wasn't until the late 1950's and early 1960's that those time slots on many major channels would be filled by cartoon content from various companies (including DePatie-Freleng Enterprises (Pink Panther), Total Television (Underdog), and Jay Ward Productions (Rocky and Bullwinkle and George of the Jungle). The styles of most of these cartoons reflected the popularity of UPA's cartoons in the 1950's. This is most visible in Jay Ward cartoons, including Rocky and Bullwinkle, which would reuse many backgrounds and animation scenes in order to accommodate for their often minuscule budgets.
But the most popular cartoons of this age were being animated by Hanna-Barbera, Starting with a particular blue dog with a southern drawl named Huckleberry Hound, they would create a menagerie of characters that would become fond memories our parents tried to teach us when we were watching our cartoons in the 90's or watching Boomerang in the 2000's. These characters included the likes of Snagglepuss, Quick Draw McGraw and his alter ego El Kabong, and Ricochet Rabbit. But the most popular of these Saturday morning cartoons in the early 1960's was a certain character who was "smarter than the average bear". Yogi Bear, named for the baseball player Yogi Berra, was a resident of fictional Jellystone Park, who would harass picnickers trying to swipe their goodies instead of foraging for his own food like normal bears. Roping in his protege Booboo and sometimes even the park ranger, he would go to extraordinary lengths just to have a few human snacks and have many adventures along the way. Despite Yogi's high popularity, he was just one of the many popular franchises Hanna-Barbera would create in the 1960's.
Past and Future
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c8c/f5c8cf35d9a73d03321b14c379c99c3754b2d053" alt=""
The smash success of "The Flintstones" increased the demand for more cartoons in prime time slots. But what could the studio create to top their biggest success? Why, the exact opposite idea of course. Instead of the Stone Age, why not have a show take place in the future? And instead of having a more "Honeymooners" approach, why not slip back into more childish ideas? Well, the reaction to the show was about as well as you'd think. It wasn't as though "The Jetsons" was a bad show, but the fact that Hanna-Barbera immediately retreated back towards it's "kids only" company level made things so much worse for the company. Following the futuristic (yet somehow dated) exploits of George Jetson and his family, the show covered much of the same ground as their predecessor show, with a futuristic edge. It wasn't the success Hanna-Barbera hoped it would be, but the show still garnered success and acclaim for the studio in a time when their content was beginning to show signs of recession.
Fall from grace...
Tom and Jerry was then passed along to Chuck Jones, who had been recently fired by Warner Bros. and was in the need to animate something with his new animation studio, Sib Tower 12 Productions. However, these shorts were also lukewarmly received. Not because the animation quality was poor, but because Chuck Jones was (despite being a master animator) not versed in the way of Tom and Jerry, his cartoons came off with more of a Looney Toons appeal, with more of the traditional Chuck Jones "breaking the 4th wall" jokes and focused more on the reactions to the pain than the pain itself. As a result, Tom and Jerry continued to fade past it's time and was ultimately cancelled in 1967.
The Xerox Process
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e96fd/e96fd9acaed7ef8a50f71b7cc378601a1d6ba0a0" alt=""
The animation in the film is very choppy and has been criticized by animation critics for decades, but it would keep the studio in business, so it was sort of a double edged sword. But like the best Disney films, the appeal of the characters was enough to draw in audiences, particularly with the highly popular villain Cruella De Vil. One Hundred and One Dalmatians was successful in it's domestic release and would become one of the most popular films the studio would release, ultimately grossing over $200 million dollars at the domestic box office all time.
The great success of the film can also be attributed to the studio's top story man, Bill Peet. Peet had been an animator at the studio since the 1930's and had helped establish some of the most acclaimed scenes in Disney history, including the Mad Hatter Tea Party. By 1959, he was the only story man in the studio and was more than eager to take on the challenges that were in front of him. Peet would be placed in unofficial control of their next film, The Sword in the Stone, to much less successful results. Peet's word was law until the weak reception to Stone, a comical look at the King Arthur stories, to which Walt would take complete control of his animation studio again to tackle their next film, The Jungle Book.
Sheer Holiday Perfection...
Like another animated milestone released almost thirty years earlier, the short was foredoomed to failure by many in the media. But the simplistic nature of the animation, the realism of the characters, and the deep and thought provoking message appealed to people in a way no Christmas special had before. Very few Christmas specials in 1965 would dare talk about religion, and this show directly read from the bible in an effort to show everyone the true meaning of the holiday. The show has since garnered widespread critical acclaim and is one of the most popular Christmas specials ever made. The success of A Charlie Brown Christmas prompted many more Peanuts Holiday Specials and many other Christmas specials released during this era.
Fun Fact: With A Charlie Brown Christmas came the abrupt end to the popular trend of aluminum Christmas trees, as the show mocked their commercialism and how they had completely ignored the true meaning of the holiday...
The Marvel Super Heroes
Rumbly in my Tumbly...
In order to properly introduce Winnie the Pooh and his friends to American audiences, Walt decided to break up the originally full length animated film into separated segments, beginning with Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree, which premiered in 1966 to widespread popularity. Since his debut, Pooh has become one of the studio's most popular characters, allowing the franchise to be marketed throughout all sorts of mediums, including movies, television shows, video games, merchandise, and more. This first featurette would ultimately be joined by Winnie the Pooh and the Blustery Day (Which won the Academy Award), and Winnie the Pooh and Tigger Too in becoming one full feature length animated film in 1977 as The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh.
A Death in the Family...
However, not all of the things happening around Walt Disney was positive. He went into the hospital in 1966 to fix an old injury he had suffered while playing polo back in the 1930's. But while going through his X-rays, Walt was told he had a tumor on his left lung. Having the lung removed in November, Walt was given the timeline of six months to two years to live. Walt was determined to complete his last stages of work on all of his dream projects, including fixing and fine tuning what would become the very last animated film he personally supervised.
Bill Peet was given the green light to develop a story based on Rudyard Kipling's magnum opus, The Jungle Book, prior to the release of The Sword in the Stone in 1963. But the latter's failure forced Walt to take drastic measures to oversee the production of the film himself. When Peet presented his treatment for the film, he was shocked to see Walt had rejected it. When the two argued over how to make the film, Peet left the studio, never to return. Walt was determined to turn Kipling's dark and moody set piece into a breezy, laid back, Sparknotes retelling of the story with only the most minute similarities to the book. Walt made sure his animators focused entirely on personality animation, even going as far as to have best friends Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston animate roughly 65% of the film themselves. Walt's decisions also included hiring personal friend George Sanders and popular icons Phil Harris and Louie Prima to portray characters in his films. He also revamped the music, hiring studio musicians Robert and Richard Sherman to write the songs, effectively eliminating the songs written by Terry Gilkyson, with the exception of the most famous song from the film, "The Bare Necessities".
But before the film could be completed, Walt returned to the hospital in December 1966, and would never come out, dying on December 15th, 1966. The company was devastated at the loss of Walt, as was the country. Without Walt, many felt the company would capsize. But determined to see through his last goals and dreams, Roy Disney moved ahead with the plans to create Walt Disney World while the animators worked tirelessly to complete The Jungle Book, which finally premiered in theaters in October 1967. Marketed as "The Last Disney Film", the film was an immense success at the box office, garnering more money than any animated film had ever done previously and prompted the Nine Old Men to begin cultivating the next generation of animators to succeed them.
The Origins of Anime
The success of the anime in both Japan and America can be attributed to the career of Osamu Tezuka, who is considered by many in the industry to be the Japanese equivalent to Walt Disney. While he'd worked on multiple stories and ideas, Tezuka had two projects he is best known for. The first was Kimba the White Lion, an anime following the story of an orphaned white lion cub trying to keep peace between the humans and the animals of his kingdom (which bears some subtle similarities to a later big budget animated film, but nothing drastic). The other was Astro Boy, a sort of superhero retelling of Pinocchio, where an inventor creates an android to replace his dead son. Both shows were successful enough to have American companies try and fail to create imitation copies, but neither would truly propel anime into mainstream America until the 1980's. But the seeds of the new art form had been planted. All it needed was another guiding hand...
Action for Children's Television (ACT) and the Dawn of the Dark Age
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81573/8157370bd36a603b367d866865646e52a5404e54" alt=""
"Animation is just for kids."
"Why would I want to watch that kid stuff?"
"It was fun when I was a kid, but..."
These quotes became very telling of the next twenty or so years of the medium. No one in the media took animation seriously anymore. The decline in interest intensified over the years into very few animated products becoming successful, causing many networks and studios to completely abandon animation or relocate it overseas to countries such as Japan and South Korea. Animation would remain very stagnant over the next several years and would take a combination beyond anyone's comprehension to rescue the medium. Because while many frown upon the 2000's as a bad time for animation, the 1970's were a bad time for animation all across the board...
Scooby Dooby Doo!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7109/a71097ab625174f495329c009ee410194dd22d31" alt=""
Most people look endearingly on the success of Hanna-Barbera's various "Scooby Doo" series. I don't. Despite it's immense success, Scooby Doo was one of the driving causes of the decline of animation in the 1970's. The plots of the show were simple and easily recyclable and allowed for animation to be just as easily recycled as it's stories. The characters were basic stereotypes (Velma was the nerd, Daphne was the DID, Fred was the leader, Shaggy was the coward, and Scooby was the dog), and would be the foundation for almost a dozen spinoffs and ripoffs over the next forty years.
While the spinoffs have ranged from mediocre to tolerable over the years, the ripoffs were by far the worst. In the 1970's alone, half of all of the content being animated in the decade was based off of this easy to recycle formula. These shows included: Josie and the Pussycats, Jabberjaw, The New Scooby Doo Mysteries, The Tom and Jerry Show (which was the first truly gut wrenching show), various Flintstones shows, among others. The primary suspect of these crimes was Hanna Barbera, who by the 1970's was almost as creatively bankrupt as possible and was facing the intense likelihood of bankruptcy, with no truly successful shows being made at the time. No one should truly look upon Scooby Doo with as much reverence as they do, because even though the original show was harmless, it jeopardized the medium into complete eradication...
The Magic is Missing...
The first animated film, The Aristocats, follows the adventures of a family of well kept cats abandoned by their owner's greedy butler hoping to steal their future inheritance. With jazzy cats, gossiping geese, among other animals, the film was aimed directly at children, something that always dooms Disney when they follow through with that formula. Though the film was a success in 1970, it's less than stellar animation and easily childish story aren't enough for it to be viewed as a classic by many in the industry.
Robin Hood, on the other hand, has received great praise over the years by fans despite not being successful at the box office (with respect to the numbers grossed by it's predecessor and successor). The story follows the basic events of Robin Hood's life, told by anthropomorphic animals, including his robberies of Prince John and subsequent rivalries with him and the Sheriff of Nottingham and romance with Maid Marian. While the action is much better than The Aristocats and the story is much more suspenseful, the lack of depth and emotion in the story works against it and it, despite the best intentions, is again not strong enough to warrant success.
The Rescuers often gets lumped into the same category as The Aristocats, but I find much more flaws within this film than most others do. With the most simplistic take on the animation (including the odd choice of taking the white out of the two main mice's eyes), weak and flimsy villains, and a meandering plot cost this film in my mind to make it the worst Disney Film deemed "A Classic". However, The Rescuers is one of two films made by the studio in this era that was being used as training films. With many of the Nine Old Men retiring and passing away, they had begun a recruiting and training process with the Disney sponsored college, The California Institute of the Arts, or CalArts. Many of the names in these classes and programs would be filled with many of the most influential people in both animation and Hollywood overall, including John Musker and Ron Clements (The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, The Princess and the Frog), John Lassetter (Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Frozen), Tim Burton (Beetlejuice, The Nightmare Before Christmas, Edward Scissorhands), among others.
The Forgotten Gods
Williams was best known for his very imaginative look on animation. This can be seen in his abstract scenes in The Thief and the Cobbler, alongside his interesting animation styles and ideals. He chose virtually any color design or style he felt would help give his animation meaning, being one of a few animators at the time that truly cared about what he was doing. His passion would cause Disney and Warner Bros. to recruit him for a top secret project they worked on in the 1980's, but more on that masterpiece later...
Bluth's mastery of the animation would lead him to create some of the most beloved films of my childhood along with many who grew up in our time. His early independent works included the spectacularly animated The Secret of Nimh (a personal favorite of mine) and animation for the interactive laserdisc video game, Dragon's Lair. But his time in the sun would come eventually, once a legendary Hollywood director saw fit to stand beside him.
A New Medium
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76cf2/76cf21f96146dc1ababb0e15e54c02bcceee013d" alt=""
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Pinocchio, Fantasia, Bambi, Cinderella, Peter Pan, Lady and the Tramp, Sleeping Beauty, One Hundred and One Dalmatians, The Sword in the Stone, The Jungle Book, The Aristocats, Robin Hood, The Rescuers, and The Fox and the Hound
One Last Hurrah
Despite the sudden departure of Don Bluth, the Disney Animation Department, headed by the remnants of the Nine Old Men, continued work on their next animated film, a fable about how a fox kit and a hound puppy became friends despite the prejudices of their society. While still maintaining much of the childishness of the previous decade, 1981's The Fox and the Hound would be one of the most beloved Disney films since The Jungle Book. It dealt with dark themes (such as prejudice, vengeance, and death), and treated it's audiences seriously rather than pander to them. While the film still missed part of the charm that older Disney films had, the film was beloved by critics and is still deemed a superior Disney film to all of it's contemporaries.
The film was the first to be truly animated by the next regime of animators. While some of the old guard remained (Art Stevens, Richard Rich, Joe Hale, Vance Gerry), most of the animators were being shown the path to the next golden age of animation. Names such as Don Hahn, Ed Gombert, Glen Keane, Mike Gabriel, John Musker, Ron Clements, Andreas Deja, and many others had something or other to do with the making of this film and would be the pioneers of Disney's greatest era. But the old guard and new guard would clash over how to tell these films and how to create them. This clash would continue throughout the 1980's, culminating in the film that nearly destroyed Disney Animation...but that's a tale for another page...